Skip to content
Vraelis
DocsPricing
Sign inCreate account
An engineer holding a circuit board beside network equipment.

System integrators

System integrators.

Review task reports across the software and equipment you bring together. Find where supplier reports disagree before the integration reaches release.

Talk to the team→→Explore the beta

The work

The task crosses more than one system.

Keep source identity, asset identity and timestamps attached to the evidence.

Identity

Find the intended asset

Compare reports for the requested task and asset. A successful service response does not establish that the intended robot completed the work.

Timing

Expose missing completion

Review the available recording window and the task deadline. Missing evidence should remain visible instead of becoming a pass.

Change

Catch unintended effects

Check whether an asset required to remain unchanged appears to have received or executed the task.

Current recorded-report workflow

One task. Every available report.

Define the intended asset, completion window and assets that must stay unchanged. Compare the captured reports against that requirement, then inspect the source events.

Recorded evidenceJSON / MCAP

01 / Define the requirement

Intended asset
Robot A
Task
task-104
Completion window
10 seconds
Keep unchanged
Robot B

02 / Bring the captured reports

  • Control panelRequested and displayed state
  • Task serviceAccepted and reported state
  • Device reportRecorded device state

03 / Compare against the requirement

Same task. Intended asset. Declared coverage.

Check source events on a shared timestamp basis, within the captured intervals.

✓Passed×Failed?Inconclusive
Illustrative requirement. Findings link to supplied source events. Missing evidence remains explicit. Files stay in your browser; reports do not establish physical ground truth. Live device connections are not available.

Reports describe recorded state. They do not establish physical ground truth. Live device connections are not available.

What comes next

Make the first integration repeatable.

Hardware-agnostic support is a development goal. Today, compatibility depends on the documented report schema.

Today

Map supported reports

Use the documented JSON schema or supported MCAP messages. Preserve raw source events and coverage information during preparation.

Pilot

Choose one supplier workflow

Use a bounded test recording with a known expected outcome. Compare the findings with the engineers who know the system.

Next

Expand adapters with evidence

Prioritize additional formats from actual integration needs. Native SDK execution, live hardware access and continuous monitoring are future work.

The problems →Our goals →Recording format docs →

Bring a problem worth solving.

Talk to the team→→
Vraelis

External software review.

Defense. Infrastructure. Robotics.

Product

PlatformRecorded evidenceRecording betaIntegrationsAI assistantsPricing

Solutions

DefenseInfrastructureRoboticsGovernment & institutionsSystem integratorsEnterpriseExplore solutions

Resources

DocumentationDeveloper toolsThe problemsResearchChangelog

Company

Our goalsAboutContact

Trust

SecurityPrivacyCookiesTermsAcceptable use
More policies
LimitationsRefundsData rightsSubprocessorsTrademark
Know your systems work.

Vraelis verifies software behind physical systems, with evidence you can inspect.

© 2026 Vraelis
Image sourcesLinkedIn